hudders wrote:
tirpitz, it seems that every thing points towards an acceleration in bike technology going from track to road stock, and build quality cant be getting worse when you look at the kit on modern bikes.
What I mean by 'build quality' isn't the mechanical side of things, I mean the cosmetic finish. The painwork is a whole lot worse on modern Kwaks than it was 20 years ago, and it was never superb then. Honda were the market leaders for build quality in the 80s and 90s. The result used to be that if you ran a sportsbike year round a Kwak would suffer big-time from corrosion whereas a Honda would fare better. Nowadays I speak to lots of riders of new Kwaks who are having issues with paintwork rubbing off (yes rubbing off

) bikes that are only used in the summer and never see rain. These guys are pretty pissed off, especially as the dealers don't want to know and are claiming 'wear and tear'. This is on bikes less than 12 months old.
This adds a great deal to the depreciation of the machine. A well cared for bike can look very tatty, very quick.
The main reason why 400s were / are made is because of Japanese licensing laws. It is a very popular capacity class. They were imported here (first as greys) because insurance made them attractive. Then the supersport 400 racing class here gave them a boost and Kwak decided to officially import the ZXR (no other 400 was an official import). Once the powers that be decided to abandon 2-stroke racing and with it the 400 race class they died in popularity. Also the new laws in the UK that saw the introduction of restrictions made 400s on the road less attractive, as you could get a bigger bike and restrict it, then derestrict in due course. They are probably still big sellers in Japan (unless licensing laws have changed) but we are back to the grey import only situation in the UK. You have to remember, we only see a fraction of the kit the Japs produce over here. The best stuff they keep for themselves
Sorry to drift off topic again..........